Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (66697)	7/26/1999 7:12:00 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) of 1574187

Scumbria RE: <<You have to remember that Intel's only real expense in manufacturing. They have saved a lot of engineering cost by pushing all of their high profile projects out a few quarters.>> First I did not say that intc practices predatory pricing, I said it was suspected . Secondly, a finding of predatory pricing is not predicated solely on the lowering of a price below its production cost. A finding of predatory pricing can be made if it is deemed that certain calculated acts were taken in order to create a monopoly in a particular product line. Thirdly in the Businessweek article that brought up the issue of predatory pricing vis-a-vis intc, an analyst from S.G. Cowan flat out said that intc was selling its low end chips below cost. How he would know this fact? I don't have a clue. So that is why I have not made the accusation on this thread, only suggested it as a possibility, using the Businessweek article as a reference. Having said all that, why are you bringing this to my attention? It feels a bit like an admonishment which is surprising to me since you have brought up the issue of predatory pricing both on this thread and the intc thread as well. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next