Hello Sudhir,
Thanks for your post; it seems Kaiser, and WillP, are too busy too comment.
Some questions, some rhetorical, for you:
1) Which institutions, specifically, or generally, are negative on the resource sector?
2) "why resource related funds that in the past have limited themselves to gold and other metals are 'relaxing' their rules to allow for diamond investments?
A: Gold is way, way down. Ask DB why they have internet diamond conferences. Surely you've cottoned on to this trend.
3)"WSP is being labelled by many as dead money. They say this without staining the attractiveness of the results. It is the 'dull' and 'undervalued' assets, once understood, that usually attract large investments."
A platitude. Please demonstrate conclusions from factual arguments.
4) "Can someone tell me what exciting news came out between September 1998 and December 1998 to take the price from the $1 level to the $4 level? Review the news from this period and consider the news that will flow over the next 2 months"
A: Last December, a certain influential investor took up most of the PP. The market reacted like Bill Gates bought some Bid.com.
5) What does this mean??? "Declaration: 50% of our current position (which is free money) in WSP was protected with a 10% trailing stop loss. This was triggered at $3.78. The remainder of the position continues to be held."? Buy, hold or sell?
Looking forward to being enlightened (of mind, not wallet),
Confluence |
