Biotech vs. Shorts Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech vs. Shorts

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (74)	7/28/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: dalroi	Read Replies (1) of 427

When indeed there was a 1 billion short position this issue would be solved very rapidly glia could issue a 2 $ divident then the shorters had to pay 21bilon$ to evry one who had glia shares in there account or even better give out warrant eg 1 for each share owned wrrant would make it possible to buy 1 share for 15 and 1 share for 20$ and then one for 25$ and another for 30$ this has a dual advantage 1/ glia gets all the funding it needs 2/ shorters realy bite to dust because now there not only short shares but for evry share a waarant which lets you buy 5 glia shares at different levels 3/ if we excersise our warants there is no dillution and we get a hell of a shortsqueese DID YOU KNOW THAT the clearingshouse is ultimatly responsible for the shorts it let create ? if glia comes out with this plan ( i copied it from a firm called tigershark ticker jaws) (only way it didnt work there was because owner printed shares so increased float by 4 times) i'll by put on the trading houses which allowed shorts ANYWAY ONE SHOULD REALY read yahoo ipo jaws or tgsk thread very instructive we could however also call all ower certificates which would create havock in dtc and TA hehehehe :-) Stefaan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next