SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum
MU 241.14-6.7%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Bakunin who wrote (47334)7/28/1999 9:00:00 PM
From: Carl R.   of 53903
 
No, it doesn't work that way. The only thing that matters is supply and demand. If supply exceeds demand, the price falls. If RDRAM takes off (which I have said I don't think it will), the larger dies will reduce the supply of memory. On the other hand the prices will be 25%-50% higher than SDRAM because of substantially higher production and testing costs, so demand for memory may fall as well. Thus it is possible that a shift to RDRAM would help the memory makers, but it is also possible that it would be neutral.

As for high margins, the margins are much higher early on than they are later. This is because supply is less. The only way that you get a Xeon-like pricing situation is if there is only one producer and plenty of demand. This is not the case here.

Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext