SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 154.12-3.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (349)7/29/1999 7:24:00 PM
From: Bux  Read Replies (1) of 13582
 
slacker711, You imply that QCOM could not effectively compete if W-CDMA (whatever it turns out to be) is marketed by ERICY. It is my understanding that the technical specifications for any widely deployed wireless standard will be published allowing open competition. It is the opinion of many engineers that QCOM's IPR is not likely to be bypassed in any mobile CDMA standard that is competitive. In other words, even if ERICY markets a W-CDMA, QCOM will still collect the same size royalties from each device manufactured by anyone and QCOM could choose to manufacture W-CDMA devices also. If ERICY incorporates their IPR in a new standard, and chooses to collect royalties from it (on top of the QCOM royalties), the standard would be at a further competitive disadvantage. The new standard would need to be significantly better to attract customers. However unlikely this is, QCOM should still be well positioned to compete and even if they choose not to make devices for that standard they would still collect the usual royalties from each device.

Bux
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext