SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PROLIFE who wrote (676)7/30/1999 3:20:00 PM
From: The Street  Read Replies (2) of 10167
 
No. I will try and find the new study.

I still say put breathalyzers on ALL cars.

The thing is this: I can drink < 3 beers and be legally intoxicated in my state. That is assinine. At .08%.

.10% makes more sense.

But, mass produced, it would only ad $50 to a car.

Why don't they do that?

As for pot-- the problem is that there is no real test of "intoxication" for pot. Maybe just a field test and let a jury decide?

No way coke makes you drive worse.

Herion, X, Shrooms, etc. it would be pretty obvious-- the saucer pupils and all.

I agree on being VERY harsh after DUI/DWI the first time. But, 1st degree murder? I don't know-- they are trying that in Georgia right now.

Note: I had a DWI 15 years ago. Almost died. Since then I gave driven drunk twice, and over the limit a dozen times or so. Not bad for 15 years. But, I have had 3 friends get their 2nd DWI's and the game has changed. I have not driven over the limit in a long time. Just take taxi's now.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext