SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maxed who wrote (4250)7/31/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: gemsearcher  Read Replies (1) of 7235
 
Hello Eddy , Goalie and All.

A few thoughts on Q2 and going forward:

1. Clearly , the McKay write-off and the amortization of the Randgold payment had a dramatic affect on EPS ; unless Marsfontein proves out a longer life (it will - CJ told me he thought 10 years and we should know the drilling results in August - only question is "when" for accounting purposes) , this amortization charge will continue to depress EPS ; doubtful we'll see another significant exploration write-off this year - all the properties with accumulated costs in the AR are still "active". FWIW , I believe it's a little premature to measure SUF as a function of EPS .IMO , CFPS - i.e. does the co. have the cash to feed the engine without having to access the public markets is far more significant a measure at this stage.

2. CFPS for Q2 was lower than Q1. This really surprised me because a measurement of Q2 vs. Q1 looked like this:

a) Q2 - 277K carats X $114/carat = 35 CFPS.

b) Q1 - 200K carats X $121/carat = 37 CFPS.

I spoke with the co. about this - apparently , SUF received payment for its last Q2 produced parcel on July 2 - i.e. it will be reflected in Q3.

3. The direction of the analysts' questions on the conference call , and echoed in FM's comment in today's FP story , was whether SUF can generate sufficient cash flow post M1 to fuel the exploration /development engine without having to go to the market/dilute. (Strangely Teevee, there does not appear to be any market concern whatsoever that SA is going to fall off the face of the earth/spiral into an abyss/implode - ;-)). I thought the co.'s response was bang-on - assuming no new Marsfontein pipes/blows , the co. feels that even under conservative projections , it will be more than able to bridge the CFPS drop post M1 until Klipspringer fissures are ramped up/ Camafuca and Messina kick into production.

4. I really respect these guys for the conservative approach they take - while given the share price I am sure there must be some temptation to hype/overstate , they resist it and focus on building the co.

5. The next 3 - 4 months are going to be exciting/telling - Marsfontein/Klipspringer exploration/reserves will become clearer , Camafuca bulk sample complete (hopefully in a climate that increasingly looks like it may be peaceful) , Messina done/financed and who knows - NWT/Brazil exploration advanced ?.

Regards and a good weekend to All.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext