Mike,
So you believe you bought into a pump and dump?
Nope, not me. I am not a shareholder.
Thank goodness.
I have followed the thread since Dusty was posting. She has been gone for a long time. It seems like a lot of energy to waste on your part, but it's your dime and I don't begrudge your grudge.
The energy I "waste" is certainly no more than the hypester "wastes".
If I can save even one unsuspecting "investor" from losing money in what I believe to be an investment scam, my fight will have been won.
You appear to be going the extra mile to put a negative spin on LGOV. I responded to your analysis point by point because I think that's the only effective discussion technique. We each form our own conclusions based on the same facts, plus or minus some spin. That's what makes a market. You might want to screen your comments a little more carefully to protect yourself from prosecution.
My comments are based solely on the reported numbers. As stated before, I didn't make them up. If there is anything negative in my findings, that is not my fault.
As far as your point by point response, you haven't responded to my point by point response.
I don't own any IBM, but I do hold a little LU, T, HDI, WGO, et al.
techstocks.com
Have fun, Phil |