This thread is getting a little ridiculous because you have a severe reading comprehension problem. Let's go through this very slowly for the fourth or fifth time.
You pretend that $200,000 worth of stock is miniscule yet he paid for that with
hard earned money.
No. I "pretend" that $200,000 worth of stock for ***someone who has about $140,000,000 of stock*** is miniscule. $200,000 of CUST stock might be significant for you and me, but it is totally insignificant for someone who has about $140,000,000 of stock. As a matter of fact, it is about 0.14% of his CUST holdings. Please tell us which word in this paragraph you do not understand and I will explain it very patiently again, Mike. No hard feelings.
I was short more than $200,000 of CUST stock at one point a couple of weeks ago -- I have since lightened up a little. By no means am I a market mover in a stock like CUST. I am just dust in the wind. The fact that Cook, the CEO of CUST with $140,000,000 in CUST holdings, is trading in quantities that I am trading in is at the minimum meaningless, and at most, disturbing. The phrase "WTF?" comes to mind.
If Cook is serious about adjusting his holdings, why screw around with 0.14% of his holdings? That would be like if I had a $200,000 position in CUST and adjusted it by $280 (0.14%). I then publicize it because I have to. Then some shill comes along and says, "Look! Wang adjusted his holdings in CUST by $280. He must know something we don't. Wang smart, we stupid."
Yeah. We stupid. But for a different reason. |
