SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : NOPT: Northeast Optic Network, Inc

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RobbRacer who wrote (467)8/3/1999 4:35:00 AM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (4) of 708
 
LOL! Point by point a big nothing, as predicted. Revenues backlogged over 17 years? A Neon executive readily and verbally answered truthfully on this when asked, right? I'd prefer it upfront, granted, but there was no hedging when asked the obvious question.

No one reported the specifics of these conversations with this secretary- no one here knows even if she ever really thought the Gilders in question were brothers or if she was confused or simply mistaken. You have misrepresented what was said in the posts of those who called this secretary. LOL The posts didn't say anyone mentioned the Gilder Technology Report by name to this woman at all. LOL. George thinks maybe the lady is crazy, but maybe HER Richard does have a brother named George too, who wrote something, or she got the brothers name wrong and he STILL wrote SOMETHING. Imagine, the OTHER Gilder might have a brother who can write too! What a coincidence that would be. LOL. You've misrepresented even the posts on this thread. "After word got out..." and she quit saying they were brothers, she probably had been set straight for crying out loud!

Gilder didn't simply say he was not a brother to this Richard as you claim. Gilders statement? "The Richard Gilder who is a principal in Gilder, Gagnon, and Howe is not related to me
in any way." Is that succinct enough? See post 218.

You wrote "Then Goerge Gilder himself posted on the thread (post 242) that he did have a
father named Richard, a son named Richard, a late cousin named Richard, and a
great grandfather named Richard but none of THEM were related to Riched Gilder..." Why is the word THEM important to you? LOL...
As if this Richard could be related to THEM(Georges close relatives) without being related to George. LOL. Who do you think you are kidding?

Now that you've twisted this story away from its reality, I must add that if people are shorting this stock based on information like this they must be idiots! If they are shorting due to believing the fast runup is too much to soon, that's logical- could be a good bet but remember, don't fight the tape! VBG

Yep, ok, both Gilders admit their fathers are dead, if you say so. Perhaps this is because both Fathers would be VERY OLD now. LOL. They were both born in N.Y? WOW what killer evidence. Oh, and they were born six years apart! Wowie wow wow! With ages this close they almost HAVE to be brothers, surely. LOL

They have ancestors with common names that are uncommon? Such As? Or would sharing those names be against the rules? LOL


Which terms of S.I. use would you violate by telling what you've allegedly discovered?

Even better, which public records laws prohibit you from sharing, what?, public records? LOL

You say the G,G,&H firm made 20 million? Oh? Did they sell? Is it all their money if they did? Could you blame them if they sold? LOL.

But you really nail it when you recognize the incredible coincidence that they share similar political affiliations. Gee, with two major affiliations available in this country the odds that they'd be on the same general side must be what, 50/50 would you say? Holly GEE now I'm convinced...this couldn't possible be JUST coincidence. Ahhh, but one writes for Forbes ASAP, while the other is dinner chairman for Steve Forbes Campaign. How could two guys with the same last name EVER come to both be associated with one media mogul? Wow, that could never happen unless they were brothers, could it? LOL.

Everything you have posted is not fact, beginning with your representation of calls to a secretary, and ending with your confusion of the two Gilders when you state that Richard wrote the Neon recommendation, when in fact you meant George. You know so little of G. Gilder you can't even get the name straight!

The facts are truly on your side. I'm happy for you.

Dan B
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext