D. This is what I was referring to <<Anyone want to talk... I've been busy in the lab... Send mail to jarst38@pitt.edu (this is where I am in med school/Ph.D. program>> I interpreted this to mean you wanted to take discussions off-line. The fact that you posted a school with and a .edu e-addr raised your credibility.
Actually you have mis-interpreted me. I'm real up front/direct. Put yourself in my shoes. Soneone suddenly appears on a day after a significant announcement, on a day where an obvious short posted. Your post did not show either the detail orrientation of someone I expect going in the direction you are headed, not did you reflect common practives for academic writing. The healthcare journal articles are full of x-refs. And what was really suspicious aws the lact of healthcare posts before VICL. I don't post about retail, oil services, construction since I know nothing about them, and have never been in the industries. I am passonate about healthcare.
My intent was never to antagonize you but to flesh you out - either you made the mistake of making serious charges without taking the time to post relevent details, which was sloppy and innappropriate, or you were a short.
If I could embarase you prefessionally, I hoped you would post real details and substantive analysis.
Finish your exams. Gather your thoughts. Post well, or don't bother.
I'm not a hypster. While others on several threads encourage links to Raging Bull, I won't waste my time there anymore. The threads I've followed are nothing buy cheerleading & clueless hype. I exposed the huge flaw in a OTC financing plan & the companie's checkered past. I was dismissed. Stock hit $5 before the dump started. Now it's around .40.
I realy do respect good analysis, even when it goes against one of my positions. And I detest games playing and repeated shallowness/hype even when it may benefite one of my positions (short term)
Again, I was not trying to get you to stop posting. I did want you to take the time to think thru your posts, clarify your subject matter & offer support. I don't think that's unreasonable, nor anoagonistic.
I did not mean to offend. Scott |
