Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kapkan4u who wrote (67469)	8/3/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (2) of 1574683

Kap, From the Jc-news link: c't also had a complete SPEC test for K7-600 and P-III-600 broken down by all the parts of SPECint and SPECfp. Here are bottom lines: 'estimated' K7-600....P-III-600....Xeon-III-550 SPECint95base 27.1.....24.8....24.2 SPECfp95base 21.5....14.8....14.8 They did everything according to the rules, but didn't submit and get approval from SPEC so they are officially 'estimated' values. The Xeon only had 512k cache. c't has a SPEC license. God I love that mag! " Perhaps elmer is going to whine again about the SPEC numbers. Looks like a 50% advantage to Athlon over PIII in fpu. These appear to be even better performance than AMD promised at Dirks presentation. As I just came back from vacation- I see little has changed. The benchmarks are a tad more encouraging. But no parts or boards or systems. Like a few other folks here Scumbria, Pravin etc AMD is by far my largest stock holding after my latest purchase. I hope like hell the announcement and run up happen next week. Good luck to the longs. Regards, Kash

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next