Pray tell, what might have so abruptly changed their strategy?
Well, of course one can only guess. Perhaps they belatedly realized that they'd been listening to people who weren't telling them the truth? Shame! As I've said before, they really shouldn't sue us, they should hire us to teach 'em how to do research.
But why was the HITT complaint--containing allegations that are, at least as far as I'm concerned, entirely unfounded--included in Myers's last filing? Didn't any alarm bells go off when he read that they thought I lived in Texas? I mean, after all, they DO know where I live; they sent me mail here. Was it just a feeble attempt to make me look bad, even though they knew it wasn't true? And if that's the case, what, ah, might we consider it in legal terms?
And then, of course, we had WILDWEST/WILDWeST over at RB, announcing that Dean Dumont was soon to be added to the Webnode case. Extremely strange, no? Now we do believe we know who WW is. Can it be he called Bizwire or Myers, and that they had some doubts about him?
Will we ever know? |
