Biotech vs. Shorts Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech vs. Shorts

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Biomaven who wrote (82)	8/4/1999 7:22:00 PM
From: BMcV	Read Replies (1) of 427

Keep coming back to theStreet.com 's bit on Sepracor. The more I think about it, the less likely it seems like just shoddy journalism, sensationalism, or some other generic problem. I don't think Herb Greenberg was just short at deadline. The mystery is why repeat something twice that he knows (as we know from his response to RCM's emails as well as his next-day follow-on answering the email from Robert Macek) is false? To me, the formulaic repetition was reminiscent of nothing as much as a paid advertisment. This raises a much more serious question. Was Herb Greenberg paid by a professional short (Jordan Kimmel of Magnet Investment Group) to trash one of his objects? Another shill, Dan Dorfman, comes to mind.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next