TD,
There you go again with your selective, truncated arguing:
If you want to call me narrow minded, fine, but it is the pot calling the kettle black. You very narrow view of the right for Jews to be on this earth is petty, vicious, and not appreciated by me. BTW, I am not Jewish myself. TD
TD, you must have flunked Reading Comprehension while in high school.... I talked about a WASP/Jewish compound but you obsessively zeroed in on the Jewish bite --why? Let me tell you that others before you have tried to pile on me as a vicious, crypto-anti-Semite --to no avail. Face it, TD: you should have labelled me anti-WASP as well! Which would lead to tag me as an un-American freak who is against 85% of the American people!! (WASP+Jews).
So, let me take it from the top again: I think the Jewish bite is important to mention because it shows how vast was the conspiratorial ring that ultimately rubbed out JFK in 1963. As President elect of the United States, every former candidate will, sooner or later, be faced with inescapable dilemmas leading him to, somehow, ''betray'' the lobbies who sponsored him for the Oval Office. JFK was no exception: as one of the most popular US Presidents, he knew he had a landslide majority to support him in ''fixing'' the CIA (after the Bay of Pigs fiasco) and to pull out of Vietnam in due time. Yet, at the same time, JFK was challenging the military business lobby as well as the hawkish intelligence establishment (Cold War times). Besides, the Catholic question did play a role in Vietman (remember bishop Spellman [spelling?]).
Things might have been smoothed over IF JFK genuinely belonged to the WASP Establishment and openly shared the Protestant ethos of the American mainstream, but he didn't.... Hence the clincher to terminate him.
My 2 cents,
Gustave. |
