SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis
SPY 685.66+0.2%Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Les H who wrote (22162)8/5/1999 8:34:00 AM
From: HairBall  Read Replies (3) of 99985
 
Les Horowitz: Today we have got a budget surplus, we have got substantial reductions in the national debt, the prospect we will pay off our whole national debt some time in the next 15 years.

I have posted on this before. I guess I must be stupid or something, because I just don't get it.

The supposed budget surplus is to be approximately 1.25 trillion over the next 15 years. Clinton has already proposed "new" spending programs exceeding the above-mentioned surplus. Assuming there actually is the above surplus after spending more on new programs than the supposed surplus, how in the hell do these guys think they are going to pay off over 5.5 trillion (growing by the second) in debt?

I do not want to turn this thread into another discussion about weather there is a surplus or not, but I can't believe this logic.

Can someone tell me what I am not seeing?

Regards,
LG
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext