SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.570+0.6%Nov 10 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DanZ who wrote (2860)8/5/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Read Replies (3) of 10293
 
Those who think that institutions can smell out a scam may want to look very closely at an ex-company called Crazy Eddie. The darling of Wall Street for a couple of year. Virtually everybody involved with it went to jail. The institutions got killed.

Or consider Mr. Soros' Russian investments. Or Julian Robertson's pathetic performance in companies like US Air, which they are finally trying to FORCE into doing something profitable. And you can look at all the institutions which poured tons of money into Phoenix S&Ls, Integrated Resources, or many others. Stupid people? No. Fail to do due diligence? No. Blinded by their own faith in their decisions. Usually.

It cuts both ways. Shorts are -- in my experience -- generally a whole lot more objective about stocks. It's a lot easier to be objective when you train yourself not to think of a stock as "my" company, as shorts necessarily have to do.

The fact that a single institution is buying a few thousand shares of some small-cap company with a dubious cold remedy doesn't mean that I should follow. They're often dumber than I am.

No position in GUMM, short or long. Just making an observation.

mg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext