I don't believe that 85 per cent of the Americans ...
Same to me, as I indicated in the paragraph's end. I wanted to point out that two of his assumptions exclude each other logically, as far as I can see. I indicated that I assume the correctness of the second assumption, which in my eyes is opposed two the first one, so that thereby my disbelief in the first assumption was revealed.
As for the allegations that Bush and Nixon didn't know where they have been at the day of president Kennedy's death, it is part of the narrative, it is tried to allege that both were trying to hide there actual presence in Dallas. From which source the allegations of Bush and Nixon's denial to know their place of resence on that day stem, I don't know (and would be interested.
After some research I found however that on the server that supplies Gustave's story there are two other versions trying to make 'the Bush connection'. Here at one place the story with the three names 'Barbara', 'Houston' and 'Zapata' is also told, but one of the three names
has a different meaning now. (In one story, it is a boats' name, in another version, it is the code name of the operation). This difference in detail indicates that at least one of the authors wasn't as well familiar with the alleged original source of the info as is asserted.
I personally put the highest importance to the fact that was noted by FlatTaxMan, the seemingly proven impossibility for Lee Harvey Oswald to shoot JFK in the way the Warren commission assumed.
I agree that the dollar is the biggest motivation for the ongoing storytelling, but I still don't stop listening - you know my 'maybe' attitude.
Regards MNI. |
