No, it is my raised eyebrows.
This is the posting that got to me a bit as it seemed so gratuitously mean; I have italicized the crack about me:
To: Christopher Hodgkin (49486 )
From: George S. Montgomery Friday, Aug 6 1999 5:37PM ET
Reply # of 49681
Dear Chris (Oh, where are Christine and Penny!): The TB to which you refer used to have an aspect of class. He used to roam around in an arena in which there was a Galt. And Galt was flawlessly imbecilic. And there were the Michael's and the James's who called him, Terry, not Galt, FATHER T.
I have destroyed Terry two, possibly three, times in direct exchanges. His great fault is that he shrivels when on the defensive.
I am behind the move to have him stopped being FATHER T.
There is a part of him that must be admired. But a totality that is beyond excusing. Balls, it could be called. But, I believe, it is also mania, mixed with a lot of fantasy.
I will also add another statement - one that may have me rejected by the thread. EdA describes herself so luxuriously that I am forced to question the luxury of it all.
Now, as an outcast, I slither humbly to the lump-splitting, split-lumping corner of our man from the Other Side, Steven.
I will not be long for this thread. It was in response to a belch issued by Terry that I ventured back. (But it was sort of fun to come back.) george
|
