Here Here...you took the words right out of my mouth.
Pyng is a speculative stock. Pure and simple. You roll the dice, you keep your fingers crossed and you hope to hit the jackpot. It sucks to lose, but thats life and there are no guarantees hence the term speculative and STOCK(not Guaranteed Investment certificate). Having said that, I think management is responsible to its shareholders and they should be accountable.
I do not recall if Lor or the others have communicated there concerns
to Pyng other than via this thread(formal letters etc). If they have and have not received satisfactory answers, why haven't they tried
to organize the shareholders and try again but this time with a voice of a few dozen or more shareholders? If this has been done, but still no satisfactory answers, then why haven't they sold there shares and moved on the greener pastures?
I challenge Lor, Jack and others to stop the negative posts and to organize the concerned shareholders(including me) and get some answers to the concerns we all have. I feel that Mr Jacobs will listen answer to any group of shareholders who approach him in a formal, intelligent, constructive and non-hostile manner. If he doesn't, then I will sell my shares and take my dollar's elsewhere
even if I lose alot of money. I don't believe in leaving my money
invested in a ship that is sinking and the skipper refuses to
address the leaks.
Whats it gonna be Lor, Jack and others? Continue to whine and
complain(regardless of justified cause or not) or you wanna try a
different approach? If Lor or Jack decline the invitation, I am sure we all welcome volunteers to do what obviously needs to be done.
Regards,
Garry |
