Discuss Year 2000 Issues Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bearcub who wrote (7872)	8/9/1999 12:38:00 AM
From: C.K. Houston	Read Replies (1) of 9818

<you are ignoring c.k.houston's excellent research into the re-writing of medical malpractice insurance policies which RULE OUT covering anyone associated with any medical facility who has not received y2k compliant equipment certification.> This doesn't ring a bell with me. I don't recall hearing about that, nor posting the above information. Perhaps you could provide a link? If true, it's a pretty frightening prospect. I really haven't followed the nuances of malpractice insurance as they relate to Y2K compliance. I'm not sure what kind of exceptions are now in these policies. Here's some up-to-date info though, on testing medical devices. Year 2000 Legal Issues in testing Medical Devices rx2000.org Cheryl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next