International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5057)	3/30/1997 9:26:00 AM
From: Turboe	of 35569

Zeev, Have enjoyed your LEVEL headed posts in the past-- here and other threads. <<As for agendas, people talking about shares at 100 have as much a personal agenda as those mentioning zero.<< No doubt! There are no "bad" questions, IMHO. The attacks make me all the more suspicious. Those "agendas" shine like red to a bull... People talk of Fundamentals? What FUNDAMENTALS? This is an UNPROVEN extraction technique. If it works we all make out like bandits. If not we LOSE OUR _RISK_ MONEY. There are NO "fundamentals" as yet, except that there is some gold. This sector will have fundamentals when it is PROVEN and VERIFIED that the gold can be ECONOMICALLY extracted. It IS risk money. If you have anything but money you can afford to lose in any of the DD's you are extremely naive (to put it nicely). Most of these stocks (not IMPCF as CL noted) are BB's-- the wild west of stocks. Less stringent than Canadian. And Tech Analysis on a stock with no earnings? Come on... Finally, I look at the Bre-X deal as an opportunity. If the DD's can indeed "Show the money" the prices will reflect the jumping in of gold investors looking for a safer place-- i.e. the US of A... Happy Easter!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next