How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stan Walker who wrote (35)	3/30/1997 12:57:00 PM
From: Iceberg	of 1894

>Re: Classification of Problem Posters Stan, It seems that we agree on the need for three classifications, and we agree in principle on our preliminary definitions of types II and III. Now we need to clarify type I. Would it be most effective for type I to define a someone who is simply irritating, but who has every right to be irritating without being subjected to anything but being ignored? Or would it be more effective to define a type I as being someone so irritating, that some response other than simply ignoring them is appropriate? What I'm getting at is--at what level of disruption to we start classifying troublemakers as type I?--people who are simply irritating but are working within SI guidelines, or people who have crossed the line into behavior inconsistent with SI guidelines? What is your thinking on this point? Thanks. Ice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next