Many who support the death penalty abhor that innocent folk have perhaps died as a result of mistaken identity. Even so, they have brains enough to know that our mistakes in carrying out a system that is philosophically sound does not justify our eradicating the reasonable system to accept a system that is abundantly unreasonable. These folk argue for more care in the system's implementation, not an elimination of the system altogether.
>So, applying this rationale to abortion, there should be no issue with the rape,incest etc. problem that routinely comes up, even for those that believe the fetus is a life. And yet there is! This dufus we had running for gov in California... (snip)<
Well firstly you cannot with reason apply this dumb blond California non-thinking to abortion. Secondly that "dufus" you had running for gov in California certainly by no means represents the entirety of the pro-life population. Indeed I would wager most-pro-lifers would allow exceptions in cases of rape and incest.
>Lets take it a step further to assault weapons. We know what assault weapons do, they destroy life. Some of those lives might be bad guys but some are good.<
This is so dang dumb it makes me angry. Just plain dumb! We do not know anything of the dang sort. Were I to place an assault weapon on a table and look at it, the dang thing would just lay there. Assault weapons will destroy no thing until some wacked out California drug peddling pervert turns it on someone and pulls the trigger. Even then it has to be loaded to be of any use.
>So, if "life" in its purest form is truly the concern of the anti-choice crowd (and not control, return to the 50s, etc), then these same people would advocate removal of assault weapons from society, right?<
Wrong. Unlike murderous pro-baby killing wackos, many pro-lifers accurately understand that guns kill nothing. They understand that people kill, and accordingly call for people to take responsibility for their actions, as opposed to trying to blame inanimate objects for their misdeeds.
>Using the "life is sacred" philosophy. Another massive contradiction from these people.<
("Massive contradiction," she says.) Here is the contradiction: a woman has sex with a guy. She gets pregnant and then goes to someone to have her baby murdered. Here is another contradiction: another woman, who herself was adopted, vigourously advocates parents be allowed to murder their children at the public's expense. Dang stupid.
>My family once told me that in the early 60s when you adopted a kid you knew you were going to get the very top or the very bottom of society.<
Well. In my opinion, people who think this way are incorrigibly mucked up-- and so are their dang children.
>As far as the very top ones are concerned, I consider them to be victims of men that agressively pursue them for sex, based on my observations and what I recall of life as a 19 or 20 year old.<
Well when folks like you overlook a president who does the same (and worse), allowing him to remain at the head of the free world, you certainly ought to have brains enough to keep your dumb mouths shet on this issue.
>Men are agressive persuers of attractive women at that age for sex and this includes telling them lies, date rape and all kinds of "macho" behavior that is tolerated in our society for 20 year old males.<
And for presidents too, missy. The thing is all connected. You can't go waltzing your butt around like some sanctimonious nitwit talking about the 'predatory male,' all the while supporting a president, even tacitly, who is a dang predator.
>Some of the more naive women fall for this and once in a while somebody gets pregnant... not by choice.<
And all wemyn (who think they are not na‹ve) are the most na‹ve of all. Maybe they aren't all pregnant, but in my opinion they are nevertheless the greatest sluts. Wemyn cannot with consistency whine about men without condemning and rejecting Bill Clinton. Each moment that passes where they allow Bill Clinton to maintain respectability, they reveal themselves to be utter sluts. Better they reject men like Clinton, showing that no man can do what he has done to his wife, daughter and other women while maintaining respectability. Were people to do this consistently, they would over time see a whole lotta 19 and 20 year-old men rejecting the predatory aspect.
But of course wemyn are complete sluts. So they will roll over and take it from men like Clinton, all the while whining their ditsy butts off about 19 and 20 year olds.
>I refuse to condemn somebody in this situation, but if I had to make a selection it would be the boys and not the girls I would blame.<
Blame yourself, missy. Blame your friggin' self. |
