XYBR - Xybernaut Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Allan Kyle who wrote (2781)	8/12/1999 5:30:00 PM
From: Dave Shoe	Read Replies (1) of 6847

>>>The wireless radiation point seems odd given >>>that at a max the radiation is that of a small >>>cell phone, and can utilize digital for much >>>lower radiation. The concern I anticipate is that, unlike cell phone RF radiation which exists only during a phone conversation, an "internet wearable" would seem to be transmitting for extended periods of the day. There may be health concerns with wearables which are not yet apparent in heath data gathered from shorter-duration cell phone exposures. Satisfactory solutions (if a problem exists) may be out there, but this is a concern which presently has my attention. Some solutions might include very low transmission powers, transmit on demand, or maybe use of a "wideband" transmission algorithm which distributes the energy over a wider frequency spectrum, thus reducing resonant exposure levels. I'm not a wiz on this stuff, just curious and cautious. Again, I don't see this as a concern in the industrial environment because transmission energies can be kept extremely low in these controlled surroundings. Shoe.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next