Ron. I didn't state my position (that implies rigidity)-I stated part of my analysis!!!!, which I actually got carried away with, wasting good time, and only because you stated only part of my analysis (position) for me.
Re: your insistence that I give advice. I believe this to be a tactic on your part, to slice off something I say so you can ridicule it, as some kind of tit-for-tat, correct or not???
You do recall I have given very, very little prep advice, both for the above reason , and because, unlike you and others like you that advise specifics to purchase or refrain from, I do NOT want to be in the position of underadvising anyone, depending on what occurs, thereby potentially being responsible for deaths or at least loss of assets if someone/s so relies on my advice.due to under prep.
For example, I believe the max period you advise anyone to prepare for is 60 days of food, right? What if a family of 4 relying on such runs out of food on day 60 and food delivery chain is disrupted longer and this family can not locate any more food?
In that senario, you would have 4 deaths on your conscience, right?
This may seem like an absurd senario in present time, right?
Check out the emb systems y2k problems along that ENTIRE chain, as well as the other chain of dominoes interrelationships, and you might find it a very GRIM possiblity that you and others like you advising others for minimal prep JUST MAY WELL POTENTIALLY HAVE THAT KIND OF senario to account to yourselves and your god for. |
