You are always welcome to post. So that is not an issue. Neither your 30 level irked me, I assure you it opened my own eyes when I compared your thread and your posts to mine, Friday to Friday resume is something you will not be able to find even if you collect all the posters, it is comparing 'something with nothing' no offense intended Lee.. you know I have great regard for your classic economic sense.
One thing on AKA, you post your bullish stance ggg posts under 'Lee' on 'Ideas', please go back and have a look predominantly you will notice that. On that other thread and some great bearish sites you post under L3 aka L3. It was revealed to me because once you posted as Lee concurring with me and a gg and in same vein I saw an exactly opposite view under L3, it was kind of funny I thought.
I have never ever told anyone not to post, I have defended my positions strongly, like I posted my 'Friday to Friday' resume of calls and challenged that come on lets see 'who dares win', there is a pin drop silence and that is what shocks me. Why don't you take the 'gauntlet' and see who makes what kind of calls?
Lets only publish your own last week predictions or last year and publish them, for me MU can go to dogs but within present trend to short it was wrong. Like wise my bottom was 113 on bonds you predicted 6.50 on bonds now where are we?
In your thread case people has been told not to touch the 'jokers' and truth has been policed the jokers are pampered remember Fleetwood, Wei or ...and have been asked to leave the thread, I will never do that I never police 'ideas', you guys do that all the time, allow me to have a comparison to your 'MDA thread posts' over last three months, Idea and MDA side by side, I will take only Ike posts you can compete with your entire crowd, I throw the gauntlet lets do it, it will be greatly educational and lovely exercise.
Lets understand 'weak not very weak bullish bearish but bullish sell but buy' what does all that mean. I have never been able to make a sense out of it.
I take this thread seriously after 22 years in markets, a guy who could not trade a single share until two years ago, has never been picked up by you, that is most unfair. I as a trader tell you have been astounded and shocked by some of the posts on your thread and you guys have ignored all those blatant foolish calls. You have a lot of time to bite your tongue in my case. I find it a little unkind cut!
I will like you to apply the same 'microscopic scrutiny' I go through in your own neighborhood you will find that it is horribly skewed. You come to my thread because I offer something I don't go to any of these ?contagious sites? (only when a crisis is sparked I am so horribly enlightened like I have been with all those posts) because main posters only offer confusion, since you say that you trade both side of the market lets look at it and study what that both side means? Being short 90 out of 100 times and being a 'deflation and inflation' hawk for last 36 months? Is that both sides of the market, market most important barometer is S&P futures, it is the most speculative and most dreadful instrument in the armory of successful day traders, the pits have lot to do with the noise in a day, you guys rarely ever take into account, some movements of SPU are purely ?stop related? it is noise, in your thread most of time you take guidance from DOW, this is not very professional. If you can?t even predict inter day SPU I think the market is to big to even be comprehensible. Any model that ignores SPU and takes its cue from DOW or even SPX is flawed on short term run. How can short term prediction being made without any knowledge of S&P futures, that is what we laugh about all the time with our friends. On my thread I make sure that my little corner understands and not be so naive to be taken as a herd. Unfortunately, this is not only my view we have scrutinized many of these calls and we run them very often and our guys in the pits laugh on these calls, so do I.
Nothing wrong with it, I have published my resume of last week calls, can you most kindly enlighten me with your resume and your cohorts discussions of last week, it will be great experience to settle debate which you have been most gracious to initiate. I write here every day to share my hard earned experience, I think every word I write has to ?stand to public scrutiny?.
Public trust is one thing I think is the only criterion we need to take care off, I write after 22 years of market experience, why people fool with ?exotic theories? when they perfectly know that they cannot stand the test of scientific scrutiny? The day I will deflower this ?public trust? and write without my actual on my posts and if I have nothing to add to what is already known I will never ever write. I will maintain a decent line and great professional style in my posts but will look forward for you to intiate this comparison, I will certainly learn.
With best wishes and kindest of regards.. Ike. |
