C-Cube Message Board - Msg: 10962464

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube

CUBE 36.44

+0.4%

1:51 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Rieman who wrote (43873)	8/15/1999 11:12:00 AM
From: Black-Scholes	Read Replies (2) of 50808

Are you saying there is no latitude for creativity and quality distinction in an MPEG encoder? That once a firm produces a "legal" MPEG encoder, then that firm's bit stream is the same as another firm's bit stream AND regardless of what brand decoder is used the quality of the final product will be the same? It states very clearly in CUBE's prospectus that there is quite a bit of latitude for distinguishing the quality of an encoder. Again, if CUBE owns 70% of the encoding market, is it possible that CUBE keeps the "best" code of the encoder for itself and, voila, CUBE's decoders just seem a little clearer? I think this is very possible - if not probable.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next