Kerry, Don't you find it a bit disturbing that the Bee article written by Leslie Pardue (?) changes so drastically in it's continuity? The author is a very colorful and discriptive writer and when the NVID statements are introduced, the tone conspicuously changes to DRAB, nonspecific, nondescriptive, and BLAH. I recognized this as obviously embedded statements, although I can't speculate on the specifics as to the "who" or the "how." Read through the article and see if you recognize the flow changing from a good scientific flow, to the "blah" NVID information, and then back to good scientific and referenced continuity...
How can Droog (or anyone) due his DD when you and NVID won't provide us with anything to go on aside from "faith?"
Faith is great, Kerry, and I beleive in "good faith" pertaining to the inherent goodness and strength of people, and the belief that everything will work out and be O.K., (after we all go through hell), but remember, we are currently living in a three dimensional plane and scientific phenomenon and laws apply to this world whether we like it, or not...
So please don't insult our intelligence with the "if you believe in the magic potion it will POOF, ZiPpO, ZaPPa make us all rich" mentality. Give us some science to go on! (Excluding trade secrets.)
And the names and numbers of independant labs! |
