Microphonics Inc. (mrps) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microphonics Inc. (mrps)

MRPS 0.0001000

0.0%

Dec 30 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: saigon69 who wrote (7597)	8/17/1999 9:41:00 AM
From: Mark McNew	Read Replies (2) of 8189

What say all you friggin' hypester longs about Spy's post? Don't you dare sit there and pretend to ignore it!!! Interesting device, it has some similarities to the Microphonics units, but it is not quite the same thing. What's your point? I see nothing wrong with this picture. They have a different test unit that does some functions that on the surface 'sound' the same, but it is not the same. People that use electronic test equipment would be familier with the difference between, say, a digital multimeter and an analog meter. Each has it's uses in different situations, and the existence of one does not diminish the usefullness of the other. . Is this other company a fraud? Hard to say with only a short look at the web site. Probably not though. Do they only exist to discredit mrps and SSA? I'm not sure whether that premise or the question is more ridiculous <g>. Speaking of which, what about that patent information??????? What about it? SSA stated that a statement clarifying the patent information is coming soon. What patents? See previous answer... Is this other company in violation of mrps' patent rights??? Probably not... Fluke can hold patents on all or various parts of it's digital multimeter designs, but that doesn't prevent others from designing similar devices, just not exactly the same. Is this bashing??? It is if you keep repeating the same patant crap over and over. We went over this the other day and are waiting for information. The information on a potential copmpetitor is not bashing, but the way in which you presented it (friggin' hypester longs) and other phrases makes it appear so, IMHO <g>. Mark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next