SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear?
XOMA 26.87+1.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cacaito who wrote (11318)8/17/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: opalapril  Read Replies (3) of 17367
 
I know Ellen still has a fan or two here. Good. Everybody needs at least one friend. But she blew it on this one. Cacaito is correct. On the day immediately following the conference call, the IR person has NO BUSINESS commenting on the P-3 results OR the future stock price.

The conference call was the forum for discussing P-3 results. Castello chose not to do so and articulated as a reason his desire to maximize the chances of FDA approval. Draw your own inferences, as RobertK would say. But then, what's this business about Ellen following up with an interview of her own? What is she running, a shadow government?

As for saying she was quoted out of context about future uncertainty when she was really referring to the stock price -- "Hell's bells," as Archie said to Mehitabel, "That's an explanation not an excuse."

When an IR person opens her mouth to say the future stock price is uncertain the Wall Street version of the Heisenberg Principle states that this very comment will cause adverse market reaction to the stock price. The standard expression elsewhere is (and ought to be at Xoma) "We do not speculate about future market prices."

Ellen needs to have that tattooed on her forehead. What could she have been thinking?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext