Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kash johal who wrote (69068)	8/17/1999 5:56:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) of 1576683

Re: "Well I had been led to believe that coppermine would be competitive with the K7. a 3-10% improvement doesnot bode well for Coppermine at all." Kash this is all rumor at this point and I don't want to make a big deal about this but you are not being entirely forthright here. You quoted the lowest number and you misquoted it. It's 5-10%, not 3-10% as you posted. If SPECint95 improved by that amount it would outperform the Athlon at the same clock speed, and that's at only 100MHz FSB and only SDRAM, but you interpret that as "Coppermine sucks". The 133MHz FSB performs even better and still doesn't show what benefit might be had from DRDRAM. A possible 21%+ improvement (maybe more with DRDRAM) in FP is certainly significant as well. All this is of course completely unconfirmed and pure rumor at this time but I think your reaction is off the mark. EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next