How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stan Walker who wrote (41)	3/31/1997 8:09:00 PM
From: Iceberg	of 1894

>The type of post I had in mind for the Type I was the "you're an idiot" type of post >they are derogatory in nature, contain profanity and contain no information relevant to the thread they were posted on. I would still classify these as Type I because our response should be the same, to pointedly ignore the poster. Stan, My impression of what you are suggesting is that type I be at a level where some type of response, or non-response (such as ignoring the poster) is indicated. This makes sense to me. Here is a rough draft proposal for the classification system... type I -- irritating, counterproductive comments lacking factual or referenceable content type II -- potentially dangerous to investors/traders type III -- obviously dangerous to either computers or people Profanity, vulgarity and off-subject posts are inconsistent with SI rules, and therefore may not need to be included in the classification system being developed...especially since these could be applicable to any of the three types indicated above. The three proposed classifcations are basically levels of severity for discussion purposes only. What do you think? Ice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next