Interliant, Inc. (INIT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interliant, Inc. (INIT)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TraderTerry who wrote (786)	8/18/1999 11:52:00 PM
From: AlienTech	Read Replies (1) of 1214

You need to go back read all the old posts, A lot of good info is posted and I dont think I want to go find all of it. But in short INIT makes more money from ASPs' than webhosting. They are the largest ASP and are bigger than others like ISLD and DIGX even in webhosting. They have 1/3rd the number of domains hosted by VRIO. Softbank holds 8% of INIT and the co-chairman also sits on softbanks board. The management used to run ameridata before it was sold to GE. They grew that one from 50mil to 1.5bil when GE took over and they started Interliant. Sage bought out Interliant and became INIT. They also bought some companies in JUL (wow last month) that does NT ASP's.. So I expect to hear Office rent-a-apps soon. Almost everyone wants in and money is no object. But trained personal IS! IBM/EDS/INTC are biggies thats spending a ton of money in this area. They are also a partner with NSOL now where NSOL sales people will refer INIT to host the sites that regiater their domains with NSOL. Except for the bloodguts black mark and brand new, This company reminds me of a gorilla in the making with great contacts world wide. The black mark keeps the funds out which affect the price. I really do belive INIT should be trading higher than both DIGX and ISLD right now. The black mark is due to all the mergers, They were not able to finish them in time for the earnings report and had to redo the accounting IE instead of doing the revenues from the beginning of 1998 for all the companies they bought in 98, They only took the revenues from the date of purchase. (there must be a reason? I dont understand why they did this). Apparently ML did not like this at all.. But I think you are only talking about under 3 mil in revenues here.. Amazing..

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next