SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jbe who wrote (52039)8/19/1999 3:59:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) of 108807
 
The distinction can be made in terms of Nature and Culture: man is the only species that depends upon the symbolic transmission of its "ways" to survive. Every other species is instinctual, and any learning that may take place is incidental. Culture is grounded in nature, but it is not "natural", but invented. Culture imposes its own order upon nature, adapting it to human ends. Human history is a record of the changes wrought upon the Earth by those determined to tame and shape it. The main fear is of the traumatic effects on nature of so much manipulation, since culture depends upon a reliable background of natural processes. A great deal depends on how resilient nature is. If we take the analogy of a garden, it would appear that nature is quite resilient, and will merely adopt a new ecological pattern in the wake of human contrivance. If we take the analogy of a polluted stream, it would appear that merely going about our business can wreak havoc. The question is, which analogy is more relevant to judging the effects of culture upon nature? I would say that of the garden....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext