SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ATI Technologies in 1997 (T.ATY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Marc who wrote (3881)8/19/1999 9:30:00 AM
From: Marc  Read Replies (1) of 5927
 
Intel retreats from graphics chips
By Michael Kanellos
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
August 19, 1999, 4 a.m. PT
URL: news.com

The world's largest and most profitable chipmaker can't seem to cut it in the graphics
world.

Intel is getting out of the business of making discrete graphics chips for personal
computers, according to a company spokesman, a market it entered less than 18 months
ago to fanfare and dismal sales. The company will continue to produce "integrated"
chipsets, which combine a standard PC chipset with a graphics processor, but these
products will likely remain targeted at computers selling for $1,000 and less.

The retreat is the result of poor sales and mediocre products, critics say, and is merely
the latest in a series of missteps by Intel in this market.

In 1997, the company purchased notebook graphics chipmaker Chips and Technologies, a
deal that closed last year at a cost of about $430 million. So far, no products taking
advantage of technology acquired in the merger have emerged, sources inside and outside
the company say.

In 1998, the company released its first graphics chip for desktops, the i740. Many industry
executives and analysts predicted that Intel's financial and manufacturing muscle would
make the i740 a fixture in the PC graphics world.

Competitors, however, quickly released chips that outperformed the i740. Intel had to sell
the chip at fairly low prices to dealers in Asia, sources said, and the i740 was eventually
canceled.

Moreover, the recent decision to get out of standalone graphics chips means the death
knell for similar products. Intel has scuttled the 752, a graphics chip for desktop PCs
introduced in April, as well as its successor, a chip called the 754 that was once destined
for the second half of this year, the company spokesman said.

A third chip, a future notebook graphics processor code-named the Mount Blanc, has also
been terminated, sources said.

The 740, 752, and 754 chips were based on technology from a company called Real3D, in
which Intel had invested. Intel also took a $24 million stake in workstation graphics
specialist Evans & Sutherland last year.

The remaining graphics product Intel has left on the market is the 810, a chipset that
combines a traditional PC chipset with a two- or three-dimensional processor. Early
versions of the 810 contained a bug and had to be recalled, according to Intel, but those
problems have been fixed.

The company's lackluster performance can be attributed partly to its size. Unlike Intel,
most graphics companies are relatively small and nimble.

"They literally have all the resources they need. They have a huge engineering staff and all
the IP [intellectual property] protection they need. They have the manufacturing," said Jon
Peddie, president of Jon Peddie Associates, a consultancy based in Tiburon, California.
"But they are just too comfortable. They just don't have the same sense of panic that the
smaller companies like Nvidia have."

The Chips and Technologies acquisition, Peddie added, seems to have been a mistake.
"They bought what they thought was the market leader," he said. In fact, the company
was already on the way down, losing market share to NeoMagic, the current leader in this
arena.

Although Intel will continue to make integrated chipsets, success there could also be
difficult. Such integration tends to degrade graphics performance, experts say.

Graphics chips are also relatively cheap: A fast 3D processor can sell for $20 to $40. As a
result, high-performance PCs will likely continue to depend on standalone chips over an
integrated product.

Intel may resort to licensing the graphics component for these chipsets rather than make
it on their own, speculated Peter Glaskowsky, graphics analyst at MicroDesign
Resources.

"Intel seems committed to the 810 and subsequent integrated core-logic products, but if it
cannot also deliver competitive discrete graphics chips, it should reconsider its decision to
develop the necessary graphics technology in-house," he wrote in a report today.

The 752, he added, "failed to receive even the modest welcome" anticipated from computer
makers.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext