SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jay Lowe who wrote (13845)8/19/1999 8:16:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
Jay, I'm surprised at your comments. The stock price is very important to Valence at this point in time, as they have been performing incremental financing based on that price.

Further, neither will they rush nor hold back any PO announcements. Such will be made on their own timeline, as has been much to the chagrin of long-term holders.

Nonetheless, Lev made it quite clear during the last conference call that his factory is nearly ready to produce, at a substantial volume rate, what the company considers 'commercial product.' If the product is found by OEMs to meet the specs that Valence has stated, you will hear of POs within a timeframe shorter than your '60-90 days.'

That's my estimate, of course, but it is based on market demand for such a product.

BTW, I also disagree that Valence's stock price is 'equally likely' to move either up or down from this point. A chart will not provide the answer to your underlying question. There are exogenous events transpiring that make charts useless for this scenario. These events include the presence, and possibly closure (depending upon the closing price the next few trading days), of a variable conversion clause; and the possibility of POs with measurable revenue streams and which validate the product to the marketplace. those two events will bring many new investors to this stock. IMHO.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext