SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (69390)8/20/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (2) of 1573019
 
Paul,

<" Without 0.13 in 2000, Intel doesn't have a prayer of staying in the MHz race, don't you think?"
Boy are YOU OUT OF DATE !

If AMD really can't deliver 650 MHz AthLATES until October, they will find themselves ONCE AGAIN BEHIND INTEL in the MHz - as October ends.>

First of all, if you are doing any kind of homework, you will see that AMD has already shipped 650MHz parts to OEMs in production quantities.

Secodnly, you haven't answered the question. Have you? Do *you* think Intel can keep up on the MHz scale with K7 without moving to 0.13 mid-2000?

Chuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News