SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Yousef who wrote (69486)8/21/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: John O'Neill  Read Replies (2) of 1583412
 
<<Now that is a truly "idiotic" statement ... I'm sure that IBM would "fund"
AMD while Dell, Gateway, Compaq, HP sat back and "watched" the generosity
of IBM. Ha, ha, ha ... Now I can see why you have lost money being "short"
and you are well on your way to being another "investing genius".>>

ahh...Yousef...a name caller..."idiotic" it is today....i imagine you have been called that a lot for you to use the term...i don't need to call people names...i feel sure of myself..
when a reply comes from someone (who hasn't been provoked) & it is name calling....,it really shows how immature the reply source is.

anyway...to the point:
i'm not saying IBM alone....just the industry in general does not want to be at the beck and call of intel; to have INTC as their sole source of a microprocessor might not agree with the rest of the industry...Yousef may or may not understand this...as you may have noticed...AMD is already receiving various types of support.

I guess you think the computer world wants to have only INTC as a supplier...look in the mirror and ask yousef that question.......
and make it so...

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext