SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 126.30+3.6%Jan 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ahda who wrote (39385)8/22/1999 4:14:00 AM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (2) of 116853
 
Darleen, yes I agree that a nation is just a large number of people living under
a local state and federal governing body to regulate how we are able, thru laws,
to interact together and with those outside our nation.

I also agree with you that the wealth of a nation is represented by the summation of the private and public abilities to create and store wealth and resources.

I agree with Ron Reece that not only is it difficult to accomplish with good and
sound results the accounts of a nation, but todays computer connected global
economies makes it extremely complex to deal with.

Ron wants a hands-off approach, and I say just the opposite eventho I am
strongly for a total laissez faire, but only when the playing field is level and all
play under the same rules, and no special favors or conditions allowed.

Its my belief that a total laissez faire approach would prevent those gross
events like a company dumping toxic waste into the land where people
live close by.

If the total of all nations adapted a laissez faire approach, then I would predict
a wonderful and happy and healthy planet with no hunger or pollution, and
available medicine for all. Then and only then would Ron's approach be correct.

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext