SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : VGAM - Virtual Gaming
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dr. Microcap who wrote (31)8/22/1999 2:03:00 PM
From: THOMAS GOODRICH  Read Replies (1) of 216
 
Microcap, At the very least you should give me credit for not babbling behind an alias!<g>

VGAMD should move in tandem with SNMM as they are a licensee and any disruption in Starnet will adversely impact licensees. This logic is simple enough that a two year old should be able to figure this out. IMO VGAMD was a more attractive buy under $5. I agree with you it could double given its stock promoter on board who is compensated based on buy volume, however, I would avoid VGAMD presently because it's too thinly traded, there is evidence it's artificially promoted, ANY disruption in Starnet's operations will be problematic and there appear to be better speculative values at present, SNMM clearly being one of these. Just food for thought!

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News