Discuss Year 2000 Issues Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ken who wrote (8289)	8/23/1999 1:23:00 AM
From: C.K. Houston	Read Replies (2) of 9818

<Edwarda.. "reentered this thread"..duplicitous ... Questions, ck. Could she have posted prior under a different name?> Extremely doubtful. For the first 1-1/2 yrs many knew each other on this thread. She was definitely NOT a participant. As for new posters, since you started posting. You know most of who they are, and how they write, and what they're thoughts are. Posting under another alias? Extremely doubtful. She's too bright to want to engage in this kinda stuff. Posting under various aliases ... particularly on a thread such as this is childish. That generally happens on stock boards where they're "pumping and dumping". <(another Rose/Bearcub senario?).> The only post Rose ever made on this thread was directed to bearcub. She stopped posting the same day, and had her PM function removed. The movers were at her house, and she was making her last post before she left. She also removed and changed her email address. I won't discuss this further. You brought it up. <What is your basis for not believing she does not have the supposed insider contacts?> I don't believe nor disbelieve anything about her insider contacts. Maybe she has some. Maybe she doesn't. I don't know. I take what she says with a "grain of salt" because I don't know her. Her coming on this thread because of her participation on "Thread Moron" thread made her suspect in my eyes. But, apparantly not in others. Like I said. It doesn't matter to me. Ken, I don't want to engage in anymore of this personal speculation. I won't respond to anymore posts regarding people. I'm just trying to clear the air here. Please don't pursue this conversation further. I will not participate. Thanks. Cheryl ALL: Sorry to make this a public post, it's something that usually would be done using PrivateMessage. But, I rarely engage in PM's.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next