Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 47.36

-2.9%

11:12 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (87200)	8/24/1999 7:41:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) of 186894

<What do I gain from dual celerons? The program has to be designed to use both right?> Not only the program, but also the OS. Windows 98 doesn't support more than one processor, but NT does. You might want to see Anand's dual Celeron experiment, done way back in March: anandtech.com I personally think the dual Celeron idea isn't a very practical one. Sure, you save money on two 500 MHz Celerons over a 600 MHz Pentium III. Judging from Anand's results, I'd guess that some apps will fare better on the dual Celeron 500 compared to the single Pentium III 600. But that would depend on the application. One of the limiting factors is the 66 MHz bus. Of course, the Future Power setup will allow for overclocking, so you could try cranking that bus to higher speeds. That would be a nice system for a hobbyist like myself, but that's about it. Perhaps once the Celeron officially moves to a 100 MHz bus, we'll be revisiting this topic. This assumes, of course, that Intel doesn't put any hardware block preventing dual Celeron configurations. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next