VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Pallisard who wrote (13959)	8/24/1999 10:26:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (1) of 27311

I see that the shorts are being flushed out more and more into the open. I don't know exactly why, but Zeev rubbed me the wrong way from day one. It was the "VLNC is a wonderful investment, if they don't go bankrupt tomorrow" type of statements that tipped me off. Johnson picked it up immediately too. Zeev, you are slime, excuses are neither believed or necessary. You are not a slime for shorting the stock, you are a slime for denying it while bashing the stock. I think that now that the recent shorts have been exposed as a ring of PM Deathspiral chasers (or causers), the squeeze will come fast and furious. I wonder just how legal it is to plot a massive one day short slam on a stock to force margin calls? Anyone care to investigate that one? Slime aside, I have a question for the group. It was suggested that Berg supported the price above $6 by buying on the open market. Later it was revealed that he bought the private placements. Does this mean that he bought both, or that we still don't know who was supporting the stock at $6? Did I miss something? Visnic, Larry, and Zeev need not respond.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next