ECHARTERS Message Board - Msg: 11069038

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jurka who wrote (3203)	8/25/1999 8:35:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) of 3744

Well, volcanigenisis or magmatic interconjection, will still yield treasure no matter what the mover. If you will, you can make the meteor the hammer. Or you can call it endogenetic. It matters not. A matter of conjecture is did the bleme get squeezed north south or did it not. The theory of otherworldly sources of the outpouring is around still. It is still somewhat controversial. Volcanic areas that were explosive still have similar shock metamorphism. It is admitted that the sublayer breccia is deep and extensive and so somewhat problematic for mere explosive volcanism, no matter how explosive. One can have all worlds though. An astrobleme, AND explosive volcanism, AND sea bed mineralization during phreatomagmatic phases. EC<:-}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next