Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Process Boy who wrote (69984)	8/26/1999 12:55:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (2) of 1572369

PB, <https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=11075233 > I am headed out and won't be back for the next few days but I thought I would take a quick hack at your questions before I leave. PIII Design problem: What I mean by this is that PIIIs pipeline does not compete well with K7. To put things in perspective, some CPU savvy folks expect K7 to get to 1.2GHz on 0.18 Cu - I haven't bought this yet especially since we haven't seen Cu in production but the estimates are hard to ignore. Do you really think CuMine can be pushed that far on 0.18? I would like to hear your thoughts on how far PIII will go. (if you would like to not bring it up on the thread, PM is fine.) CB's commentary on CNBC: I could have sworn it was PB on the screen instead of CB. He was saying pretty much what you have been saying on this thread. And, for whatever reason, INTC started dropping after Barreett spoke thought it reversed later. Here is where I am: Unless Intel is yielding north of 750 MHz, I wouldn't even be concerned. Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next