C-Cube Message Board - Msg: 11077442

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube

CUBE 37.36

+1.2%

Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: VidiVici who wrote (44160)	8/26/1999 2:15:00 PM
From: DiViT	Read Replies (2) of 50808

Totally useless question but: Smith Barney recently said this about Zoran: "we believe that Zoran, the nearest things to a DVD pure play" and "that although Zoran traded at a "rich valuation" of 70.4 times his 1999 estimate earnings, the share had upside because of strong growth prospects and even steeper valuations for peers." Pardon me? The rich valuation on Zoran is warranted because the valuation of it's peers is steeper? Anybody know which peers this "person" was referring to? CUBE? P/E 24.74 ESS? P/E 32.19 STM? P/E 47.62 LSI? Yahoo sez: "P/E N/A" Earnings per share -1.27 MPEG? P/E (divide by Zero error) ZRAN P/E 129.89 The way I see it is the valuations of all the "peers" need to go UP or Zorans valuation needs to go down.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next