Bill Wexler's Dog Pound Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound

REFR 1.750

-5.9%

Nov 4 3:56 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DanZ who wrote (3305)	8/26/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (2) of 10293

You have it backwards. The burden of proof is on the person making the allegations, not the alleged perpetrator. Exactly. You are alleging Bill has committed libel, ergo, the burden of proof is upon you. Bill, conversely, while alleging certain things about GUMM, has no intention of airing them in a legal court unless forced to by GUMM (by gum?), therefore he is under no such burden at this time. Once legal action is taken, matters may change, but until that time Bill owes you diddleysquat. Period, end of story.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next