Hello Mike M:
No, you are mistaken. Drivel! I take Bill's style in stride--I valued the meat of his views and his directness. Your comments neither elevate yours nor Mr. Zimmermann's esteem to me, which is approximately somewhere south of placeholders (that is, your investing views are a guide for losses, something less than zero), a contrarian indicator.
You are mistaken, MM. There is no association of integrity in my mind with Mr. Z's posts, which have much more the quality of "suspect" and "questionable" in my view. I distinguish between being able to write hype in full English sentences, something Mr. Z. has done and promiscuously (definitions 2 and 3, not the primary one), and contributing insight to investment considerations, something Mr. Z. has done at best to my experience, and couched diplomatically, as a contrarian indicator.
Really now! Consider this: idiots make themselves known.
Slight regards,
m |
