SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VPHM - Viropharma Inc

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (275)8/29/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) of 2557
 
Session: Respiratory Viral Infections
Location:
Exhibit Hall
Session Date:
Sunday, 9/26/99
Session Time:
11:00 am - 12:30 pm

Comparative In Vitro Antirhinoviral Activity of AG7088 and Pleconaril

L. Kaiser1, C. Crump1, A.K. Patick2, L.S. Zalman2, F.G. Hayden1
1Univ. of Virginia Sch. of Med.: Charlottesville, VA; 2Agouron Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.: San Diego, CA

Background: The 3C protease inhibitor AG7088 and the capsid-binding inhibitor
pleconaril are anti-picornaviral agents in clinical development. Our aim was to evaluate
the in vitro activity of these two drugs against both laboratory and primary human
rhinovirus (HRV) isolates. Methods: The 50% effective concentrations (EC50) of
AG7088 and pleconaril were determined in Ohio HeLa-I cell monolayers by a
cytopathic effect (CPE) inhibition assay read either microscopically or
spectrophotometrically after staining with 0.4% crystal violet. First passage HRV field
isolates (isolated from nasal washes from children and adults with natural colds over a 4
year time period) and 4 representative HRV serotypes (39, 16, 14 and Hanks) were
tested at three concentrations (1.0, 0.1 or 0.01 mg/ml). Results: For field isolates
(n=15), the EC50 value determined by the CPE assay ranged from <0.01 to 0.05 µg/ml
for AG7088 and from <0.01 to >1 µg/ml for pleconaril. AG7088 inhibited all field
isolates tested whereas pleconaril inhibited 13 of 15 isolates tested. The EC50 values
obtained using either microscopic or spetrophotometric methods were similar (r=0.98 for
AG7088 and r=0.99 for pleconaril). The median EC50 value for evaluable isolates (EC50
value ³ 0.01 and £ 1 µg/ml) determined microscopically was 0.018 mg/ml (0.030 µM)
(range, 0.01 to 0.05 µg/ml) for AG7088 compared to 0.082 mg/ml (0.214 µM) (range,
0.01 to 0.215 µg/ml) for pleconaril (p<0.05). Likewise, the median EC50 value
determined spectrophotometrically for evaluable isolates was 0.017 mg/ml (0.028 µM)
(range, 0.01 to 0.033 µg/ml) for AG7088 compared to 0.038 mg/ml (0.100 µM) (range,
0.014 to 0.2 µg/ml) for pleconaril (p<0.05). For 4 defined serotypes, no significant
differences in antiviral activity were observed between the drugs. The median EC50 value
determined by microscopic and spectrophotometric methods was 0.035 mg/ml (0.058
µM) (range, 0.017 to 0.05 mg/ml) and 0.02 mg/ml (0.033 µM) (range 0.02 to 0.12
mg/ml), respectively, for AG7088, compared to 0.06 mg/ml (0.157 µM) (range, 0.011 to
0.09, mg/ml) and 0.051 mg/ml (0.134 µM) (range, 0.02 to 0.12 mg/ml), respectively, for
pleconaril. Conclusions: Although under in vitro conditions AG7088 and pleconaril
have demonstrated comparable antiviral activity against 4 defined HRV serotypes, more
potent activity was demonstrated for AG7088 compared to pleconaril against HRV
clinical isolates.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext